July 2025

 

News

Employee vs Independent Contractor: What You Don't Know Could Cost You

04/03/25

Author: ADP Admin/Monday, March 31, 2025/Categories: Bulletin News

When a worker qualifies as an independent contractor, the employer is generally relieved of obligations related to payroll taxes, minimum wage  in addition to overtime requirements, benefits, workers' compensation, and unemployment costs for that individual. However, only a small fraction of workers qualify for independent contractor status.

Independent contractors are generally in an independent trade or business and offer their services to the general public under a contract or agreement. Typically, they provide their own equipment and determine how and when they work. The more control that the business has over the individual, the more likely they will be considered an employee and not an independent contractor.

Many employers refer to independent contractors as "1099" workers and employees as "W-2" workers after the IRS forms used for federal reporting purposes. However, simply providing a worker a 1099 Form doesn't make them an independent contractor. The classification must always be made on the basis of whether the worker meets federal and state tests for independent contractor status. Different tests are used to determine whether a worker is covered by a particular law or benefit. The following is an overview of some of these tests.


Federal tests

Taxes


The Internal Revenue Service uses the Common Law Test for federal tax purposes. The test has three broad categories to determine the appropriate classification of a worker:

  • "Behavioral control" examines whether the company has the authority to direct and control the work of the service provider and looks at whether the worker receives training and instruction.

  • "Financial control" looks at factors such as whether the worker realizes a profit or loss, makes investments in tools and facilities, and has unreimbursed expenses.

  • "Type of relationship" examines the nature of the relationship. This includes whether there is a written contract between the parties, the permanency of the relationship, and whether the worker is entitled to employee-type benefits.

Under this test, no one factor stands alone in making a classification determination. You need to weigh all factors (and take into account any other applicable tests) when determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor. Look at the entire relationship, consider the degree of control, and document each of the factors used in making a determination.

When in doubt, it is a best practice to classify the worker as an employee. You may also request an official determination from the IRS using Form SS-8. However, it can take at least six months to get an IRS determination.

Wage and hour

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) uses an "economic realities" test to determine whether workers are considered employees and therefore covered by the FLSA[BR1]  and entitled to minimum wage, overtime, and other wage and hour protections.

Since March 11, 2024, the DOL’s economic realities test has looked at the following six factors. Additional factors that look closely at investments by the worker, the employer’s control, and whether the work performed is integral to the business may also be considered if the worker is in business for themself.


1. Opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill

This factor considers whether the worker has opportunities for profit or loss based on managerial skill (including initiative or business acumen or judgment) that affect the worker's economic success or failure in performing the work. If a worker has no opportunity for a profit or loss, then this factor suggests that the worker is an employee. 


2. Investments by the worker and the employer

This factor considers whether any investments by a worker are capital or entrepreneurial in nature. Such investments generally support an independent business and serve a business-like function, such as increasing the worker's ability to do different types of or more work, reducing costs, or extending market reach. Additionally, the worker's investments should be considered on a relative basis with the potential employer's investments in its overall business.


3. Degree of permanence of the work relationship

This factor weighs in favor of the worker being an employee when the work relationship is indefinite in duration, continuous, or exclusive of work for other employers.

This factor weighs in favor of the worker being an independent contractor when the work relationship is definite in duration, non-exclusive, project-based, or sporadic based on the worker being in business for themself and marketing their services or labor to multiple entities.

4. Nature and degree of control

This factor considers the potential employer's control, including reserved control, over the performance of the work and the economic aspects of the working relationship.

Facts relevant to the potential employer's control over the worker include whether the potential employer sets the worker's schedule, supervises the performance of the work, or explicitly limits the worker's ability to work for others. Additionally, facts relevant to the potential employer's control over the worker include whether the potential employer uses technological means to supervise the performance of the work (such as by means of a device or electronically), reserves the right to supervise or discipline workers, or places demands or restrictions on workers that do not allow them to work for others or work when they choose.

5. Extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer’s business

This factor considers whether the work performed is an integral part of the potential employer’s business. This factor doesn’t depend on whether any individual worker in particular is an integral part of the business, but rather whether the function they perform is an integral part of the business.

This factor weighs in favor of the worker being an employee when the work they perform is critical,
necessary, or central to the potential employer's principal business. This factor weighs in favor of the worker being an independent contractor when the work they perform isn’t critical, necessary, or central to the potential employer's principal business.

6. Skill and initiative

This factor considers whether the worker uses specialized skills to perform the work and whether those skills contribute to business-like initiative. This factor indicates employee status where the worker does not use specialized skills in performing the work or where the worker is dependent on training from the potential employer to perform the work.


Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)

Under federal nondiscrimination laws, a worker is presumed to be an employee (and therefore entitled to protection under EEO laws) unless they meet certain tests. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) looks at factors suggesting a worker is an employee and not an independent contractor, such as whether:

  • The employer has the right to control when, where, and how the worker performs the job.
  • The work doesn't require a high level of skill or expertise.
  • The employer furnishes the tools, materials, and equipment.
  • The work is performed on the employer's premises.
  • There is a continuing relationship between the worker and the employer.
  • The employer has the right to assign additional projects to the worker.
  • The employer sets the hours of work and the duration of the job.
  • The worker is paid by the hour, week, or month rather than the agreed cost of performing a particular job.
  • The worker does not hire and pay assistants.
  • The work performed by the worker is part of the regular business of the employer.
  • The worker is not engaged in their own distinct occupation or business.
  • The employer provides the worker with benefits such as insurance, leave, or workers' compensation.
  • The worker is considered an employee of the employer for tax purposes (i.e., the employer withholds federal, state, and Social Security taxes).
  • The employer can discharge the worker.
  • The worker and the employer believe that they are creating an employer-employee relationship.

 

 

State tests

Some states have their own tests-- some of which are more difficult to satisfy than federal tests. For example, a number of states use the “ABC test” for determining whether an individual is covered under unemployment insurance and/or wage and hour laws or other benefits. Under this test, a worker must be considered an employee unless all three of the following factors are met:

  • The worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of such work and in fact;
  • The worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business; and
  • The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed for the hiring entity.

Check your applicable state tests to ensure compliance.


In Conclusion

Before classifying an individual as an independent contractor, make sure they've met all applicable tests. Misclassification of employees as independent contractors can result in significant penalties. If the worker fails to meet these tests, the individual is an employee and is entitled to all the rights and benefits of employees under the applicable law.

Number of views (4320)/Comments (0)

Tags: 04/03/25

Upcoming Events

Regional Alerts

Under a measure signed May 9 by Gov. Daniel P. Malloy (D), workers who care for those with intellectual disabilities at group homes and day programs are to be paid an hourly minimum wage of at least $15.

> Read more

On May 7, 2018, The City and County of San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement published “Rules Implementing the San Francisco Paid Sick Leave Ordinance (PSLO)”. These rules updated the initial rules that were adopted when the Paid Sick Leave Ordinance initially went into ...

> Read more

California recently approved new amendments to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), strengthening the protections afforded to applicants and employees, including individuals who are undocumented, on the basis of their national origin.

> Read more

A new Georgia law will require nursing home and other long-term care workers to submit to extensive background checks. Specifically, the new law will require care workers with “direct access” to seniors in long-term care facilities to pass a national background check. Georgia joins ...

> Read more

Georgia has become one of 16 states in the country that bans the use of hand-held devices while driving. Governor Nathan Deal signed “Hands-Free Georgia Act” (House Bill 673) into law on May 2, 2018. The new law takes effect on July 1, 2018.

> Read more

The Western Springs Board of Trustees has voted to opt into the Cook County sick leave ordinance effective May 18, 2018, reversing a previous decision to opt out of the Cook County ordinances. 

> Read more

On May 15, 2018, Maryland Governor Larry Hogan signed into law the Disclosing Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Act of 2018 (the “Act”), which prohibits contractual waivers of sexual harassment claims and imposes significant reporting requirements for certain Maryland employers as ...

> Read more

Michigan has modified its pay frequency requirements for monthly paid employees. Employers with established monthly pay periods are in compliance with the wage payment law if they pay all wages earned during the monthly pay period within 15 days after the end of the monthly pay period.

> Read more

On May 29, 2018, the Duluth City Council passed an Earned Sick and Safe Time ordinance (Ordinance No. 10571). This ordinance amended the Duluth City Code by adding a new Chapter 29E entitled Earned Sick and Safe Time. The ordinance will provide for paid Sick Leave and related leave beginning in ...

> Read more

The Nevada Supreme Court has concluded that an employer may pay the lower of the state’s two-tier minimum wage if the employer offers health insurance at a cost to the employer of the equivalent of at least an additional dollar per hour in wages, and at a cost to the employee of no more ...

> Read more

New Hampshire has modified its pay frequency requirements. Previously, employers were required to pay all wages at regular pay periods not to exceed 14 days. The amendment now requires employers to pay all wages due to the employee within eight days after the expiration of the work week if the ...

> Read more

New Hampshire has amended its law against discrimination to include gender identity in the list of protected classes. The law prohibits discrimination based on gender identity in employment, housing, and public accommodation. 

> Read more

The New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development has released Guidance and Forms in connection with the Diane B. Allen Equal Pay Act.

> Read more

Oklahoma became the 30th state to pass a medical marijuana law after voters approved it on June 26, 2018. The law gives broad discretion to physicians in prescribing medical marijuana, which should make it fairly easy to obtain. Additionally, the law restricts employers from taking action ...

> Read more

Rhode Island has joined the growing list of states and municipalities that have enacted paid sick leave laws. Under the Healthy and Safe Families and Workplaces Act, signed by Governor Gina Raimondo, employers with at least 18 employees must provide their employees with paid sick leave. The new ...

> Read more

The South Carolina Pregnancy Accommodations Act (the “Act”) amends the South Carolina Human Affairs Law to require employers with at least 15 employees to provide reasonable accommodations to employees for medical needs arising from pregnancy, childbirth, or other related medical ...

> Read more

Tennessee has enacted a law that prohibits public and private employers from requiring an employee or prospective employee from executing or renewing a non-disclosure agreement with respect to claims of sexual harassment in the workplace as a condition of employment. 

> Read more




 

 

© Copyright 2016 ADP LLC. 10200 Sunset Drive | Miami, FL 33173

You are receiving this email because you are a client of ADP TotalSource. ADP, the ADP logo, and Always Designing for People are trademarks of ADP, Inc. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. Copyright © 2025 ADP, Inc.