May 2025

 

News

Utah Limits Nondisclosure and Non-disparagement Provisions in Certain Agreements

04/04/24

Author: ADP Admin/Tuesday, April 2, 2024/Categories: Compliance Corner , State Compliance Update, Utah

Utah has enacted legislation (House Bill 55), which restricts certain nondisclosure and non-disparagement clauses. House Bill 55 is effective immediately and retroactively applies to agreements that are entered into on or after Jan. 1, 2023.

The details

Restricted Agreements

House Bill 55 limits the terms of these agreements between an employer and an employee:

  • A nondisclosure agreement that prevents (or has an effect of preventing), an employee from disclosing, discussing, or alleging sexual assault or sexual harassment (misconduct).
  • A non-disparagement clause that prohibits (or has the effect of prohibiting), an employee from making a negative statement about the employer that is related to a claim or a dispute related to sexual misconduct.

House Bill 55

House Bill 55 expands the Utah Antidiscrimination Act to prohibit:

  • Nondisclosure or non-disparagement agreements regarding sexual misconduct which are required as a condition of employment. Such provisions are unenforceable under the law.
  • An employer from retaliating against a current or former employee that alleges sexual misconduct or refuses to enter into an agreement that is prohibited under House Bill 55.

The law also allows an employee to withdraw from a settlement agreement that contains a nondisclosure or non-disparagement confidentiality clause related to sexual misconduct, provided they withdraw within three days after entering such an agreement.

Exceptions

House Bill 55 does not prohibit:

  • An agreement between an employer and an employee that alleges sexual misconduct from containing a nondisclosure or non-disparagement clause (or any other clause) that prohibits the disclosure of:
  • An employer from requiring an employee to:
  • An employee from discussing sexual misconduct or allegations of sexual misconduct in a civil or criminal case when subpoenaed if the discussions are against the individual alleged to have engaged in the misconduct.

The law also does not:

  • Limit other reasons that may make a confidentiality clause unenforceable.
  • Permit a disclosure that would violate state or federal law; or
  • Authorize an employee to:

Next steps

Employers with operations in Utah should review applicable agreements and confidentiality provisions and consult legal counsel to help ensure compliance with House Bill 55.

 

Number of views (4578)/Comments (0)

Upcoming Events

Regional Alerts

California has enacted Senate Bill 1162, which amends the requirements for employers regarding pay transparency and pay data reporting. Senate Bill 1162 takes effect Jan. 1, 2023.  ADP is in the process of reviewing our reporting capabilities to help support clients who need to retrieve ...

> Read more

California has enacted legislation (Senate Bill 523) that will prohibit employers with five or more employees from discriminating against applicants and employees because of their reproductive health decision making. This change takes effect Jan. 1, 2023.

> Read more

California has enacted legislation (Senate Bill 1044) that will prohibit, with limited exceptions, an employer from taking adverse action against an employee for refusing to report to, or leaving, work during emergency conditions. Senate Bill 1044 takes effect Jan. 1, 2023.

> Read more

On Nov. 8, 2022, Inglewood, California voters approved a ballot measure that increases the minimum wage for healthcare workers.

> Read more

Colorado’s state-run retirement program, called Colorado SecureSavings, is set to launch in early 2023. Employers with five or more employees must either facilitate the program or offer a qualifying retirement plan to employees.

> Read more

This notice Is to remind you to please complete your Health Insurance Responsibility Disclosure (HIRD) form filing online via MassTaxConnect before Dec. 15, 2022.  Massachusetts law requires certain employers to file an annual HIRD form, which contains information about employer-sponsored ...

> Read more

On Nov. 7, 2022, Nebraska voters approved a ballot initiative to increase the state minimum wage. Initiative 433 was approved on a 58 percent to 42 percent vote.

> Read more

On Nov. 8, 2022, voters in Nevada voted to amend the State Constitution provisions regarding the minimum wage.

> Read more

New Hampshire has enacted legislation, which creates a voluntary Family and Medical Leave Insurance wage replacement program for employers. To participate in the Paid Family and Medical Leave (NH PFML) Insurance Plan, employers can contract with the state's selected provider (MetLife) or their ...

> Read more

Rhode Island has enacted legislation that mandates a special enrollment into health care coverage based on pregnancy.

> Read more

Utah has amended its mobile workforce taxation rules, which create a taxation exemption for certain employees who work a limited time in the state annually. The amendments also modify the employer’s withholding obligations and penalties associated with that obligation.

> Read more

On Nov. 8, 2022, Tukwila, Washington voters approved Measure No. 1, which establishes a minimum wage for the city for hospitality and transportation employees of a “covered employer.” “Covered employer” means an employer that either: (1) employs at least 15 employees ...

> Read more

On Nov. 7, 2022, voters in Washington D.C. voted overwhelmingly to phase out by 2027 the tipped employee credit that employers are currently allowed to take when paying its tipped employees.  Measure 82 was approved by over 71 percent of the voters.  

> Read more




 

 

© Copyright 2016 ADP LLC. 10200 Sunset Drive | Miami, FL 33173

You are receiving this email because you are a client of ADP TotalSource. ADP, the ADP logo, and Always Designing for People are trademarks of ADP, Inc. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. Copyright © 2025 ADP, Inc.