November 2024

State Updates

 

District of Columbia Increases Protections for Pregnant Workers

02/19/15

Author: SuperUser Account/Tuesday, February 17, 2015/Categories: Washington, D.C.

Executive Summary

Overview:    A new District of Columbia law will require employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees affected by pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding, and related medical conditions and prohibit employers from requiring an employee to take leave if it is possible for the employee to continue working with reasonable accommodation. The law also requires employers to post and provide employees with a notice of rights.

Coverage:  All clients with employees working in D.C.

Effective Dates: March 3, 2014. Regulations implementing the Act, including procedures for an employer to prove undue hardship, are required within 60 days of the effective date (but may take longer).

Action Required:  Post and distribute the model notices prior to the effective dates and contact your HR Business Partner for assistance with managing accommodation issues.




The Details

The Protecting Pregnant Workers Fairness Act of 2014 (“PPWFA” or “Act”) is expected to take effect on March 3, 2014 (subject to change).  Although pregnancy-related medical conditions already are covered by the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), the District of Columbia Family Medical Leave Act (“DCFMLA”), and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (“PDA”), as well as other federal laws, the new Act affirmatively provides for accommodation of pregnant workers. According to the committee report, the Act strives to “fill in statutory gaps, eliminate pregnancy discrimination, and promote the economic security and health of pregnant workers.”

Existing Law

Under the DCHRA and the PDA, employers must treat women who are temporarily unable to perform their jobs because of a pregnancy- or childbirth-related medical condition the same way it treats other temporarily disabled employees. Additionally, the DCFMLA provides employees up to 16 weeks of medical leave, including for pregnancy-related conditions, in a 24-month period.

Employers Covered by New Law

The PPWFA covers all employers in the District of Columbia, regardless of size. It provides that employees needing accommodation related to pregnancy, such as limited time on their feet and frequent restroom breaks, also are entitled to those accommodations under the PPWFA.

Notice Requirements

Employers must post a notice of employee rights under the PPWFA in a conspicuous place, in English and Spanish. Employers must also provide written notice to all new employees at the start of their employment; to all existing employees within 120 days after the Act becomes effective; and to any employee who notifies the employer of her pregnancy or other condition covered by the Act, within 10 days of the notification. The notice must be translated for any non-English or non-Spanish speaking employees.

A model English and Spanish PPWFA Notice of Rights is available on FormSource in the state appendix section.


Reasonable Accommodations

Unless an employer can show that doing so would cause an undue hardship (significant difficulty or expense to the business), the PPWFA requires employers to engage in a good faith and timely interactive process to determine reasonable accommodations for an employee affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. The interactive process is required when an employee requests a reasonable accommodation or “otherwise needs” one. An employer may require medical certification if the employer has the same certification requirement for temporarily disabled employees.

Examples of reasonable accommodations include:

  • more frequent or longer breaks,
  • time off to recover from childbirth,
  • equipment modification,
  • light duty, and
  • having the employee refrain from heavy lifting.

The Act does not define “light duty.” The burden is on the employer to prove that a reasonable accommodation will cause undue hardship.

Additional Prohibitions

The new Act also provides that an employer may not:

  1. Refuse to make a reasonable accommodation without a showing of undue hardship;
  2. Take an adverse action against an employee who requests or uses a reasonable accommodation. This includes failing to reinstate an employee who returns to work after taking time off because of pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition. Employers must return the employee to her original job or to an equivalent position;
  3. Deny employment opportunities to employees or applicants who require a reasonable accommodation under the Act;
  4. Require an employee affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical condition to accept an accommodation that the employee does not need to perform her duties; or
  5. Require an employee to take leave if the employer can provide a reasonable accommodation instead.

Enforcement

An employee who believes her employer has violated her rights under the PPWFA and seeks redress for that violation must file a complaint with the D.C. Department of Employment Services (“DOES”). Although DOES has not yet established administrative procedures for handling PPWFA complaints, the Act requires that DOES implement procedures similar to those used by the Office of Human Rights, the office that handles discrimination complaints under the DCHRA (e.g., investigation, dispute resolution and mediation, determination of probable cause, and a hearing before DOES should probable cause be found during the investigation).

If DOES determines that an employer has violated any part of the PPWFA, it may require the employer to provide affirmative remedies, such as back payment of wages resulting from the violation and reinstatement of the aggrieved employee. DOES also may order the employer to pay a penalty of up to $500 for each day and for each employee as to whom the employer has violated the Act. It also may revoke or suspend the employer’s permits and licenses until the violation is corrected. Employers are subject to additional civil penalties for willful violations of the PPWFA; failing to post the notice of rights also results in civil penalties.

Additionally, unlike the DCHRA, it appears that an employee may file a lawsuit under the PPWFA against an employer only after first exhausting his or her administrative remedies. The PPWFA is silent on how long after an alleged violation an employee has to bring a private action against her employer, so D.C. Code § 12-301(8)’s three-year statute of limitations likely will apply to the PPWFA.

As always, please contact your HR Business Partner if you have any questions.

This content provides practical information concerning the subject matter covered and is provided with the understanding that ADP is not rendering legal advice.

Number of views (10929)/Comments (0)

Recent State Updates

 

© Copyright 2016 ADP LLC. 10200 Sunset Drive | Miami, FL 33173

You are receiving this email because you are a client of ADP TotalSource. The ADP logo, ADP, and ADP TotalSource® are registered trademarks of ADP, LLC. ADP - A more human resource. is a service mark of ADP, LLC.